Search found 19 matches
- Thu Jul 30, 2015 12:29 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Hi Elliot, "The information for all devices is kept up to date for all devices and if you are finding instances (other than specific iOS models), please feel free to let us know." This is quite frustrating now. I understand you can't return expected results about iPhones, but now I am facing issues ...
- Tue Jul 28, 2015 12:56 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Hi Elliot, I got your point that using the request user agent its not possible, but I was suggesting that if you guys can update these values manually for all iPhone models to return the correct logical resolution like you did for "max_image_width" for desktops . Also, model_name capability provides...
- Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:04 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Hi Elliot, I can see that max_image_width now returns 800. Thank You. Regarding your point, " Please keep in mind that iOS devices do not identify the underlying device hardware, making the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus very difficult to distinguish using HTTP headers alone." I understand that. But is ...
- Wed Jul 22, 2015 12:20 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Hi Elliot, I am still seeing 600 returned by "max_image_width" though resolution width returns 800. I am not able to attach the screenshot as I am getting an error "Could not upload attachment to ./files/1012_55d665b4bf006df8eb0f5115162d3fb3.". I have cleared all my cookies, but still seeing the sam...
- Mon Jul 20, 2015 11:51 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Elliot, First, please confirm this , "all the 4 capabilities will remain same for all the desktop models irrespective of screen resolution, make and model." Here is the user agent string. In Mozilla - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:39.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/39.0 In Chrome - Mozilla/5.0 (W...
- Sun Jul 19, 2015 10:36 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Elliot,
I believe all the 4 capabilities will remain same for all the desktop models irrespective of screen resolution, make and model. Please confirm.
BTW, I am still seeing 600 returned by max_image_width.
I believe all the 4 capabilities will remain same for all the desktop models irrespective of screen resolution, make and model. Please confirm.
BTW, I am still seeing 600 returned by max_image_width.
- Fri Jul 17, 2015 2:22 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Thanks Elliot for reply and that make sense to me. Request you to please confirm the default values for desktop for these four capabilities max_image_width - I am getting 600 max_image_height - I am getting 600 resolution_width - I am getting 800 resolution_height - I am getting 600 So these values ...
- Wed Jul 15, 2015 11:44 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Hi Elliot, "max_image_width" property is also giving incorrect result for desktop. My desktop screen resolution is 1280*1024 where "max_image_width" returns 600. And "max_image_height" also returns 600. Now why is that? And for iPad it returns 768*1024. It is quite confusing. Can you please throw so...
- Wed Jul 08, 2015 11:42 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Hi Elliot, Thanks for your reply. First, the URL is missing from your last reply. Also, my requirement is to detect the rendering surface width and then decide the image size. For example, If I am viewing on iPhone 4s then the image size would be 320px and when I am viewing it on Nexus 4, it would b...
- Tue Jul 07, 2015 12:01 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
I am actually interested in find out the CSS width as mentioned on below link.
http://mydevice.io/devices/
And let me know if its possible to get pixel ratio via any way. If I can get the pixel ratio, then dividing resoultion_width with pixel ratio will give us CSS width.
Thanks,
Virendra
http://mydevice.io/devices/
And let me know if its possible to get pixel ratio via any way. If I can get the pixel ratio, then dividing resoultion_width with pixel ratio will give us CSS width.
Thanks,
Virendra
- Mon Jul 06, 2015 11:57 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Elliot, Thanks for your response. But "physical_screen_width" is not going to solve the my problem. As for Nexus 4 it comes 62M and when you convert it into pixel by multiplying by 3.77 then it comes around 233.74 which is again not correct. I want something similar to what I am currently using with...
- Mon Jul 06, 2015 4:59 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
Re: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Or if you can tell me something similar to min-device-width used by CSS media queries then that would be great.
- Mon Jul 06, 2015 1:27 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: "resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
- Replies: 23
- Views: 23010
"resolution_width" capability behavior is weird.
Hi, I found that "resolution_width" capability is giving some incorrect information. As, for example, For Google Nexus 4 it is 768 and the same is returned for Apple iPad and Apple iPad Mini. And on the other side for iPhone 6 it gives 640 and Galaxy note 3 it is 1080. There is something fishy going...
- Tue Jun 02, 2015 10:35 pm
- Forum: .NET API
- Topic: The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
- Replies: 10
- Views: 44544
Re: The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
Well, initially I also thought the same and tried many times via clearing cookie but still no success. I also think it is something to do with NEWSOFT.JSON.dll.
- Tue Jun 02, 2015 12:57 am
- Forum: .NET API
- Topic: The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
- Replies: 10
- Views: 44544
Re: The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
Hi Elliot,
Let me know how much time this is going to take. As my client is also pushing it hard for the same. If it is going to take more time then I may need to look for other options.
Thanks,
Virendra
Let me know how much time this is going to take. As my client is also pushing it hard for the same. If it is going to take more time then I may need to look for other options.
Thanks,
Virendra
- Wed May 27, 2015 11:57 pm
- Forum: .NET API
- Topic: The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
- Replies: 10
- Views: 44544
Re: The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
Hi Elliot,
Can you please update me on this ASAP as its urgent.
Thanks,
Virendra
Can you please update me on this ASAP as its urgent.
Thanks,
Virendra
- Wed May 27, 2015 12:06 am
- Forum: .NET API
- Topic: The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
- Replies: 10
- Views: 44544
Re: The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
Hi Elliot, Here is the code. using System; using System.Data; using System.Configuration; using System.Web; using System.Web.Security; using System.Web.UI; using System.Web.UI.WebControls; using System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts; using System.Web.UI.HtmlControls; using ScientiaMobile.WurflCloud; us...
- Tue May 26, 2015 1:51 am
- Forum: .NET API
- Topic: The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
- Replies: 10
- Views: 44544
Re: The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
Here is the exception stack trace... ERROR: Error getting value from 'ServerVersion' on 'ScientiaMobile.WurflCloud.Cache.CookieContent'. at Newtonsoft.Json.Serialization.ReflectionValueProvider.GetValue(Object target) at Newtonsoft.Json.Serialization.JsonSerializerInternalWriter.SerializeObject(Json...
- Tue May 26, 2015 1:48 am
- Forum: .NET API
- Topic: The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
- Replies: 10
- Views: 44544
The Free version of API is not working with .NET 2.0
Hi, Before trying my hands on the standard version, I was just playing with free version of .NET API. The free version is working fine if I am making a separate web site in visual studio with my localhost url but when I am trying to integrate it my other website which doesn't run on local host, it g...