Search found 17 matches
- Tue Aug 02, 2016 1:24 am
- Forum: .NET API
- Topic: Net API 1.8.0.1 xml
- Replies: 1
- Views: 27328
Net API 1.8.0.1 xml
Im having issues updating too the latest release via NuGet and recieve the following compile error. wurfl.xml load error - you may need to update the wurfl.xml file to a more recent version. <ver>for API 1.7.1.0 release, db.scientiamobile.com - 2016-04-04 10:46:57</ver> <last_updated>2016-04-04 10:5...
- Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:59 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: Kindle is application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml right
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7802
Re: Kindle is application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml right
Hi Elliot, fyi
xhtmlmp_preferred_mime_type = application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml
was the reponse for all Kindle devices, not just HD 8.9
xhtmlmp_preferred_mime_type = application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml
was the reponse for all Kindle devices, not just HD 8.9
- Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:29 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: Kindle is application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml right
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7802
Kindle is application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml right
I was checking Kindle Fire + HD 8.9 capabilities and wanted to check:
xhtmlmp_preferred_mime_type = application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml
Is right when
html_preferred_dtd = html4
shouldnt it be: text/html
and if so what dtd would be best served? Many Thanks P
xhtmlmp_preferred_mime_type = application/vnd.wap.xhtml+xml
Is right when
html_preferred_dtd = html4
shouldnt it be: text/html
and if so what dtd would be best served? Many Thanks P
- Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:34 pm
- Forum: Device Information
- Topic: Microsoft Surface + Flash now supported
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6777
Microsoft Surface + Flash now supported
Hi I have read an article that Microsoft Surface now supports Flash player. There is no more white list, Microsoft heard feedback and removed it: Flash will now work on ALL web sites. So the Flash WURFL capabilities need to updated. I dont have a Surface tablet to test on, so might need a little fur...
- Fri Dec 13, 2013 7:13 pm
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: online test page
- Replies: 4
- Views: 37384
Re: online test page
Thanks, Yes something like that, and NO, you used to be able to search using a UA string and this returned all WURFL capabilities. The provided link doesnt, ie image format doesnt return svgt_1_1 Cheers P
- Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:17 am
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: online test page
- Replies: 4
- Views: 37384
online test page
Hi WURFL had (years ago) an online test page. I need to check all capabilities, the test UA provided only returns a few. Is there something like the old days? Many thanks P
- Wed Dec 04, 2013 8:23 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: SVG image capability
- Replies: 8
- Views: 15301
Re: SVG image capability
Thanks! from my (limited) testing I get in different results:
Android 4.0 supports SVG, WURFL svgt_1_1 returns false
IE7 does not support SVG WURFL svgt_1_1 returns true
SVG is becoming a more important capability, how accurate is WURFL in this regard, thnx P
Android 4.0 supports SVG, WURFL svgt_1_1 returns false
IE7 does not support SVG WURFL svgt_1_1 returns true
SVG is becoming a more important capability, how accurate is WURFL in this regard, thnx P
- Wed Dec 04, 2013 12:44 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: SVG image capability
- Replies: 8
- Views: 15301
SVG image capability
Hi I wanted to know is svgt_1_1 the WURFL capability used for detecting SVG graphic support. Many thanks P
- Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:29 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: not getting all capabilities (1.4.4.0)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8514
Re: not getting all capabilities (1.4.4.0)
OK I think I have got it. there has been a change in the way device_os capabilities returns iPhone OS, As above the iPhone UA returns device_os as iOS (this is what is blowing up my code). I guess the work around is to use the model_name capability instead. P
- Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:50 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: not getting all capabilities (1.4.4.0)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8514
Re: not getting all capabilities (1.4.4.0)
Well spotted! I really need to get more sleep, did not not spot that. As I mentioned that was a test script, I'm still not able to update to 1.4.4.0 without it affecting my routing, which was all fine. I have bit of work a head of me. Thanks P
- Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:19 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: not getting all capabilities (1.4.4.0)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8514
not getting all capabilities (1.4.4.0)
Since updating to .net 1.4.4.0 release I'm not returning some capabilities (same code was working in 1.4.3.1). I am using as an MVC project and built a simple capabilities test and this is the result for: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ve...
- Sun Jun 17, 2012 8:52 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: .Net API is returning different result to WURFL_DB
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14185
Re: .Net API is returning different result to WURFL_DB
Hi Datapharm, the issue i had was a coding error (my end) not a .Net Api problem. Is the issue you are having with detecting the is_smarttv query or the Api in general? As I have a LG Smart tv which gets detected as a wireless device but not as smarttv, I was going to post in Devise detection forum ...
- Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:40 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: is Opera Mobile
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8461
Re: is Opera Mobile
Thanks that got me on the right track (and learnt about UA strings copied off ISS), once I had that sorted I could see cap mobile_browser requires is; Opera, Opera Mini, Opera Mobi that was giving me some false positives which threw me, all good now though, thanks _P
- Wed Jun 06, 2012 8:55 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: is Opera Mobile
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8461
is Opera Mobile
Hi SM, I wanted to sniff out Opera Mobile/Mini and need to check i have got it right re the way WURFL is handling Opera on Android. What I get from UA: Opera/9.80+(Android+2.2.1;+Linux;+Opera+Mobi/ADR-1205181138;+U;+en)+Presto/2.10.254+Version/12.00 brand_name: Generic model_name: Android mobile_bro...
- Tue May 22, 2012 7:53 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: .Net API is returning different result to WURFL_DB
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14185
Re: .Net API is returning different result to WURFL_DB
Thanx for reply! I got it sorted, not a API issue although I have some other ?'s re new capabilities which I will post in appropriate forum cheers -P
- Tue May 22, 2012 6:15 am
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: .Net API is returning different result to WURFL_DB
- Replies: 6
- Views: 14185
.Net API is returning different result to WURFL_DB
Hi Im using the new .Net 1.4.0 API and was testing the "is_smarttv" capability. I am returning a different result when testing against the WURFL_DB for UA: Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.2; U; Series60/3.1 NokiaE71-1/100.07.57; Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) ...
- Wed Mar 07, 2012 11:47 pm
- Forum: .NET API
- Topic: periodic AGPL update
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9689
periodic AGPL update
Hi I have a Q re periodic AGPL update of .Net wurfl.xml. The latest .Net 1.3.2 contains the 17 November (wurfl-2.3.xml) release. When can we expect an update as this is nearly 4 months out of date.
many thanks Paul
many thanks Paul