Search found 7 matches
- Wed Mar 18, 2015 4:55 pm
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: Fixing advertised_device_os_version using patch file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 36441
Re: Fixing advertised_device_os_version using patch file
Thanks Elliot for clarification. I have another very related question, I want to patch similar useragents which only differ on the Silk version [Silk/*]. <wurfl_patch> <devices> <device user_agent="Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_3; en-us; Silk/1) AppleWebKit/533.16 (KHTML, like Gecko...
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 7:21 pm
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: Fixing advertised_device_os_version using patch file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 36441
Re: Fixing advertised_device_os_version using patch file
Looking at the code of WURFLPatchingManager class, it does not seem like virtual capabilities are set using the WURFL patch file. Is there any other suggested approach to fix this ? I don't want to look at device_os_version instead of advertised_device_os_version because for Firefox user agent strin...
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 7:01 pm
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: Fixing advertised_device_os_version using patch file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 36441
Re: Fixing advertised_device_os_version using patch file
Hi Elliot, thanks for replying. I am using WURFL API version 1.5.1. I modified my patch file a bit but still the controlcap_advertised_device_os_version capability does not get set to my specified value. Here is the patch file I am using: <wurfl_patch> <devices> <device user_agent="Mozilla/5.0 (Maci...
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 5:16 pm
- Forum: Miscellaneous
- Topic: Fixing advertised_device_os_version using patch file
- Replies: 6
- Views: 36441
Fixing advertised_device_os_version using patch file
I am looking at advertised_device_os_version to find the OS version information. For this Kindle fire tablet user agent string "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_3; en-us; Silk/1.0.22.153-debug_10033200) AppleWebKit/533.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/533.16 Silk-Accelerated=t...
- Thu Mar 12, 2015 7:06 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: Difference in advertised_browser and mobile_browser
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6766
Re: Difference in advertised_browser and mobile_browser
Thanks Elliot, I understand that you recommend using advertised_browser capability. But for this user agent string: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; ko-kr; LG-L160L Build/IML74K) AppleWebkit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 I see that these values are: advertised_brow...
- Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:54 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: Difference in advertised_browser and mobile_browser
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6766
Difference in advertised_browser and mobile_browser
So as to find the browserType for any device, I am wondering if I should look at mobile_browser capability or advertised_browser virtual capability. I see inconsistent behavior for same device if the user agent strings are a little different. Like for Android Chrome for Galaxy Nexus device, 1. For u...
- Thu Feb 26, 2015 8:09 pm
- Forum: Device Detection Issues
- Topic: App WebView: Device detection issue, "is_app" returned false
- Replies: 14
- Views: 19351
Re: App WebView: Device detection issue, "is_app" returned f
Hi there, Is there any update on this issue ? The user agent "Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36" is for a webview and should have is_app capability set, but it is not. Here is the ...