Slight differences between advertised_browser_version

[trickydee]

Hi, we've noticed slight differences in the advertised_browser_version between the Cloud API (1.5.0.2) and the output of the Wurfl Java API (1.6.3.0, zip fetched around 2015-10-25)

WURFL Clound API

Code: Select all

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0
Capabilities:
    "is_wireless_device":false
    "is_mobile":false
    "is_tablet":false
    "device_os":""
    "device_os_version":""
    "physical_screen_width":400
    "physical_screen_height":400
    "advertised_browser":"Firefox"
    "advertised_browser_version":"26.014462185993"

Internal implementation with a wrapped Wurfl Java API 1.6.3.0

Code: Select all

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0
Capabilities:
    "is_wireless_device":false
    "is_mobile":false
    "is_tablet":false
    "device_os":""
    "device_os_version":""
    "physical_screen_width":400
    "physical_screen_height":400
    "advertised_browser":"Firefox"
    "advertised_browser_version":"26.014462186133"

Can we have some hints as to why these two differ for the same identical header?
Thanks,
Willaim Hill

[Elliotfehr]

Hello

I am having some difficulty replicating the results that you are experiencing in both implementations. When testing this capability against the same version of the Java API and wurfl.xml in both high accuracy and high performance mode, I receive an `advertised_browser_version` of `26.0`, which is also the same result that I receive back from the WURFL cloud. Are you able to test against the WURFL Cloud using your API and the curl command below and paste the results?

Code: Select all

curl -u 123456:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -A 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0' http://api.wurflcloud.com/v1/json

[trickydee]

Hello

I am having some difficulty replicating the results that you are experiencing in both implementations. When testing this capability against the same version of the Java API and wurfl.xml in both high accuracy and high performance mode, I receive an `advertised_browser_version` of `26.0`, which is also the same result that I receive back from the WURFL cloud. Are you able to test against the WURFL Cloud using your API and the curl command below and paste the results?

Code: Select all

curl -u 123456:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -A 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0' http://api.wurflcloud.com/v1/json

Hi, thanks for coming back to us so quickly. Our tester will prepare a couple of them on Monday.

[trickydee]

We think we actually had an issue with the test and on further investigation all seems fine. Thanks.

Hello

I am having some difficulty replicating the results that you are experiencing in both implementations. When testing this capability against the same version of the Java API and wurfl.xml in both high accuracy and high performance mode, I receive an `advertised_browser_version` of `26.0`, which is also the same result that I receive back from the WURFL cloud. Are you able to test against the WURFL Cloud using your API and the curl command below and paste the results?

Code: Select all

curl -u 123456:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -A 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0' http://api.wurflcloud.com/v1/json

Hi, thanks for coming back to us so quickly. Our tester will prepare a couple of them on Monday.