ehcache vs default caching
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:17 pm
Until this point we've used the default caching mechanism. I assume this always keeps the device definitions in memory.
What is the advantage to switching to ehcache?
Also, I've seen the Spring example for this. Is it possible to use ehcache with wurfl without the spring framework?
Thanks for your help!
Kevin
What is the advantage to switching to ehcache?
Also, I've seen the Spring example for this. Is it possible to use ehcache with wurfl without the spring framework?
Thanks for your help!
Kevin